The renaissance was real, and it started in Los Angeles when nobody was watching.
For fifteen years—longer, really—I’ve been listening to how jazz gets declared dead. It’s a ritual. The obituaries arrive predictably, written by people who haven’t paid close attention in a decade. The numbers don’t lie, the thinking goes: fewer jazz radio stations, smaller clubs, fewer young musicians choosing the music as a career. By 2010, the funeral had been scheduled so many times it felt official.
Then something happened that nobody had written the script for.
Why Did Anyone Think Jazz Needed Rescuing?
The question assumes jazz was actually dying. What was really happening was a shift—not death, but displacement. Jazz wasn’t vanishing; it was moving. The institutions that used to house it (radio stations, concert halls, record labels built around jazz as a commercial category) were weakening. The music itself? That never stopped. What changed in the 2010s wasn’t whether jazz existed. What changed was whether the world outside jazz paid attention.
For decades, jazz occupied a specific cultural position: revered, usually, but sequestered. You had to choose to find it. You had to seek out a jazz club, turn on a jazz station, buy a jazz album. The infrastructure of discovery had evaporated by 2010. A teenager in Minneapolis—where I spent forty years with a microphone—wasn’t stumbling onto Coltrane or Miles Davis by accident the way we did. They had to want it actively.
This mattered because jazz had always depended on accidental discovery. You heard something on the radio, or your older brother played a record, and you found yourself curious. The digital era broke that chain. But it also created something new: a generation raised on hip-hop samples of jazz, hearing the fragments before they heard the source. When that generation finally encountered the source material directly, they came to it with fresh ears and zero deference to tradition.
What Changed About Discovery?
The streaming era made every recording available instantly, which sounds like a victory until you realize it meant every recording was equally invisible. No radio programmer could introduce you anymore. No liner notes could guide you. The algorithm could only recommend what it had already categorized, and jazz categories were brittle. You needed a guide, or you needed accident, or—as it turned out—you needed a rapper named Kendrick Lamar to make you curious.
Why Institutions Couldn’t Fix This Alone
Universities and arts organizations tried the obvious fixes: jazz education programs, concert series, artist residencies. These were necessary but insufficient. The problem wasn’t supply—there were enough jazz musicians to fill every venue in North America. The problem was that jazz wasn’t woven into the broader culture anymore. It was specialized music for specialists. That’s not a morality problem; it’s a problem of reach.
What the 2010s proved is that musicians themselves, making music that refused to stay in its assigned category, could rebuild that reach faster than any institution. The renaissance wasn’t planned or funded or administered. It happened because musicians made records that mattered to people who didn’t identify as jazz fans. That’s the actual story.
How Did Two Albums Change Everything in 2015?
The answer begins with the West Coast Get Down, a collective that played no official venues and recorded no official releases until 2015. Saxophonist Kamasi Washington and his childhood friend Miles Mosley on bass, trombonist Ryan Porter, and a rotating ensemble of musicians would gather at a small Hollywood club—really more of a parking lot with a stage—and play marathon sets. Nobody paid them. Nobody knew them outside Los Angeles. As Ryan Porter said later: “No one would take a chance on us.”
In the spring of 2015, two things happened. First, Kendrick Lamar released “To Pimp a Butterfly,” an album built substantially on the playing and arrangements of Washington and his West Coast collective. Second, Washington released “The Epic,” a three-disc set recorded in a single month-long studio session in December 2011. That album had been sitting in storage for years while Washington paid the bills doing session work for Kendrick, Chaka Khan, Stanley Clarke.
Suddenly, jazz wasn’t a backwater. Jazz was featured on Pitchfork. Jazz albums headlined Coachella and Glastonbury. Jazz musicians appeared in mainstream media. The shift wasn’t that jazz had become more popular—that’s too simple. The shift was that jazz musicians were suddenly allowed to be completely themselves on platforms with massive audiences, and those audiences proved to be far younger than the music industry assumed.
What Kendrick Actually Gave Jazz
I want to be precise about this because the conventional narrative gets it backward. The standard story focuses on the music itself—the saxophones, the modal vamps threading through “King Kunta” and “These Walls.” That’s true, but it’s secondary.
What Kendrick Lamar did structurally was something more important: he refused to use jazz musicians as texture. On “To Pimp a Butterfly,” the jazz wasn’t atmosphere or color. It was architecture. Thundercat on bass, Robert Glasper on piano, Terrace Martin on saxophone, Washington himself arranging—they weren’t session players. They were collaborators. Co-authors. That’s different from the traditional relationship between jazz and hip-hop, where jazz was borrowed, sampled, reduced.
Robert Glasper had been articulating this problem publicly for years. In 2013, he said: “Jazz cats used to be the ones who got called for Marvin Gaye or Aretha Franklin sessions. Now the whole thought of a jazz musician is that it’s not soulful anymore.” By the end of the decade, that narrative was dead. The studio relationships built through “To Pimp a Butterfly” remade how jazz musicians moved through the larger industry, and hip-hop artists began reaching deeper into jazz’s harmonic and rhythmic vocabulary with genuine seriousness instead of just sampling.
Why The Epic Mattered as a Statement
“The Epic” proved something that record labels had stopped believing: an uncompromising, maximalist, spiritually earnest jazz record could reach an audience in 2015, and that audience would be younger than anyone expected.
Those seventeen songs came from 190 recordings made in December 2011. Kamasi and his collective recorded obsessively, densely, for four weeks straight. Flying Lotus—running the Brainfeeder label and serving as Washington’s mentor—helped shape the final sequence. When the album finally arrived, the timing was everything. A generation of listeners who knew jazz only through hip-hop samples were encountering the source material with fresh ears and no assumption that it had to fit into any existing category.
| Key Albums & Artists: 2010s Jazz Renaissance | Year | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Kendrick Lamar, “To Pimp a Butterfly” | 2015 | Centered jazz musicians as co-authors on mainstream platform |
| Kamasi Washington, “The Epic” | 2015 | Proved maximalist jazz could reach young audiences |
| Makaya McCraven, “Universal Beings” | 2018 | Bridged LA spiritual jazz with London’s electronic-rooted scene |
| Esperanza Spalding, “Radio Ballet” | 2010 | Experimental approach to jazz composition and vocal technique |
| Nubya Garcia, “Source” | 2015 | London scene’s embrace of electronic production and improvisation |
| Cecile McLorin Salvant, “For One Who Knows I Wait” | 2015 | Vocal jazz pushing into experimental territory; genre-reclaiming work |
| Mary Halvorson, “Meltframe” | 2013 | Guitar-centered jazz refusing traditional forms |
What Was the London Scene Really Doing?
While Los Angeles dominated the narrative—Kamasi Washington, Kendrick Lamar, Brainfeeder Records—something equally significant was happening across the Atlantic. London in the 2010s produced some of the most adventurous jazz-rooted music being made anywhere, but it came from a completely different place.
Where Kamasi Washington drew on spiritual jazz, orchestral ambition, and the cosmology of Sun Ra and John Coltrane, the London scene processed the city’s specific multicultural present. Shabaka Hutchings, Nubya Garcia, Moses Boyd, Makaya McCraven—these were children of immigrants from the Caribbean, West Africa, and South Asia. They were bringing grime, drum and bass, electronic production into direct conversation with jazz improvisation. It wasn’t 1970s fusion; it was something more urgent, more politically grounded, rooted in the lived reality of contemporary Black British life.
“The music sounds simultaneously spontaneous and constructed because it is both simultaneously.”
Drummer and producer Makaya McCraven described his approach to “Universal Beings” (2018) as something like beatmaking applied to live improvisation: record the sessions, then edit, layer, and sculpt in post-production. The result was music that felt both utterly spontaneous and carefully sculpted. This wasn’t contradiction; it was clarity about what recording could do that live performance couldn’t.
Where Were the Women in This Narrative?
For years, the dominant story of the 2010s jazz renaissance centered on Kamasi Washington and Kendrick Lamar, two men. That’s an incomplete picture. Some of the decade’s most consequential jazz came from women who were redefining what the music could be.
Esperanza Spalding released “Radio Ballet” in 2010—a work of such fearless formal experimentation that it announced a new era immediately. She wasn’t working within jazz traditions; she was asking what traditions could be invented. Cecile McLorin Salvant’s recordings from the middle of the decade proved that vocal jazz didn’t have to serve convention; it could interrogate it, dismantle it, rebuild it with new vocabulary. Mary Halvorson’s guitar work throughout the decade—“Meltframe” (2013), collaborations with Oren Marshall and others—showed that the instrument could refuse its own history, could sound completely contemporary without abandoning the music’s values.
In London, Nubya Garcia’s saxophone work on “Source” and subsequent releases integrated electronic production and post-colonial identity in ways that made it clear this music wasn’t interested in vintage preservation. Matana Roberts, working between New York and London, created compositions that integrated voice, extended instrumental technique, and documentary-style field recording into a new form of jazz composition.
Why This Matters for How We Understand the Renaissance
If you focus only on Kamasi and Kendrick, you get a narrative about young men bringing jazz back to mainstream attention. That’s true but narrow. The fuller story includes women who were building jazz’s future in parallel: not trying to return to any past, but asking what the music could become when it refused the constraints that had been placed on it. Esperanza Spalding, Cecile McLorin Salvant, Mary Halvorson, Nubya Garcia, Matana Roberts—they were as central to the renaissance as anyone. The original narratives often didn’t reflect that because the original narratives were written by critics paying attention primarily to the music that reached mainstream platforms.
What Did the Decade Actually Leave Behind?
By 2020, jazz had recovered something lost since the mid-1970s: it mattered to young people who didn’t already identify as jazz enthusiasts. That seems like a simple fact, but it’s profound. The mechanism wasn’t institutional—not education programs or concert hall initiatives, though those existed. It was the music itself, finding new contexts and refusing to remain confined to the categories assigned to it.
A generation of musicians who came of age during this period now occupy the center of the conversation: Washington, McCraven, Halvorson, Arooj Aftab, McLorin Salvant. The audiences they built continue to follow them. Labels like Blue Note and ECM, which spent years wondering about their commercial future, discovered that future arriving on its own terms.
I’ve spent four decades in this music, and I can tell you: none of it was planned or predicted. The Piano Bar residencies in Hollywood were just musicians who needed to play making it happen. The “To Pimp a Butterfly” sessions were a rapper following his instincts about what belonged on his album. The London scene was young people making the music that reflected where they actually lived. The renaissance was what all the best jazz has been: people doing what the moment required, without first asking anyone’s permission.
That’s the lesson. That’s why it mattered. The music didn’t wait for permission. It just kept moving.
Explore more in our contemporary artists collection.
