I first heard Vulture Prince on New Amsterdam’s stream in late October 2021, a few weeks before the Grammy nominations dropped. By then the context was already public: Arooj Aftab made this album in Lahore while her younger brother Maher was dying. That fact shapes how you listen, but it shouldn’t reduce the album to emotional document. The music won’t let you do that. It is too carefully composed, too deliberate in every choice. Grief is the raw material here, but the work is formal and architectural. Aftab built something specific.

Vulture Prince centers the ghazal—the Urdu poetic form built on repetition, return, and the articulation of longing. Aftab was born in Lahore in 1985, trained at Berklee, and she sings in Urdu with the accent and diction of home. Her accompaniments—harp, bass, minimal percussion—never overwhelm the voice. Instead they create space around it. What listeners heard was jazz-adjacent, yes. But what they were hearing was equally a formal evolution inside the ghazal tradition itself. The tradition has been reaching toward this moment for centuries.

The Architecture of Silence

Listen first to “Mohabbat.” It opens with Aftab’s voice and Maeve Gilchrist’s harp—seven minutes of something that feels like memory. No drums. No harmonic support underneath. Just the two voices in conversation.

What strikes me, returning to it after years of programming jazz radio, is the discipline in the emptiness. Vulture Prince is a quiet record. Not quiet like ambient music—not a texture designed to fade into the background. This is quiet like the moment after someone stops speaking. The silence after a question. The gap between heartbeats.

Aftab’s voice sits in the mezzo range, neutral and immediate. She is not selling you her technique. She is not demonstrating what her voice can do. She is using it to convey a state—and that choice, the decision to efface herself into the material rather than assert herself through it, is harder than it sounds. I’ve heard a hundred singers with her gifts do the opposite. They fill the air with themselves. Aftab does the opposite. She gets out of the way.

Gilchrist’s harp work creates harmonic fields that breathe between Western classical music and the tanpura drones of South Asian classical tradition. Petros Klampanis on bass is there but unhurried—more structural support than narrative voice. When percussion enters, it is barely more than a suggestion. Jamey Haddad keeps the rhythm underneath, present but never insistent.

This is restraint at the level of ensemble. Every musician understood what the record needed to do.

How Jazz Harmony Functions Here

What connects Vulture Prince to jazz is not surface-level. There are no swing feels. No improvised solos over chord changes. No blues phrases. The connection is deeper and more structural.

In jazz, at its most interesting, chords are not destinations. They are environments. You can move through them in multiple directions. You can be inside a chord the way you can be inside a room. You can explore its corners.

Aftab applies this principle directly to the ghazal form. Traditional ghazal is built on return. The poem circles back again and again to its radif—its repeated refrain. It’s a form designed around repetition and variation, around returning to the same emotional place and finding something new there.

What Aftab does with harmony is create progressions that circle and hover rather than resolve. They loop back. They approach closure and pull away. This means the longing at the core of every ghazal—the central emotional architecture of the form—never quite lands. It stays suspended. The harmonic language enacts what the Urdu lyrics describe.

This is formal sophistication. I say that as someone who has spent four decades listening to how musicians solve structural problems. This is the work of someone who understands two traditions deeply enough to make them speak to each other without either one disappearing.

What the Critics Missed

When Vulture Prince appeared, the reviews were generous but they were also limited. Pitchfork’s write-up was thoughtful—the reviewer understood the album’s emotional weight. But the framing was about genre-crossing. The achievement was presented as a successful bridge between traditions. As if the primary work was taxonomic.

The Wire didn’t cover it. JazzTimes filed no review. And what got lost in that silence was engagement with Aftab as a composer. Not as a vocalist. Not as a cultural bridge. As a composer making formal decisions about how music is structured.

The arrangements on Vulture Prince are not ambient. They are argument. They ask: How do two traditions make contact without either one consuming the other? How does the ghazal remain itself while jazz harmony reshapes its harmonic landscape? The answer is in every bar.

The ghazal does not become jazz here. The jazz does not subsume the ghazal. They meet at the level of structure. And what emerges is something that does not fit easily into any existing frame.

Three Tracks That Matter

“Mohabbat”—love—opens bare. Voice and harp. The treatment makes the word sound like memory of something, not the experience of it. The emotional distance is precise.

“Saans Lo”—breathe—is the record’s emotional center. Aftab against minimal accompaniment. A piece that earns every moment of its simplicity. To make silence work this way, you have to know exactly what you are doing.

“Suroor” closes the record. It circles back into the longing the album has been inhabiting and leaves it unresolved. No harmonic closure. No point of rest. It is the only honest ending the album could have. Anything else would be a lie about what grief actually is.

The Aftermath

Vulture Prince won the Grammy for Best Global Music Performance in 2023. Which is recognition. But the category itself is a kind of box. “Global Music.” It is a designation that allows major award bodies to honor work from outside Western pop and rock contexts without having to integrate it into the main conversation.

The record does not belong in that category. Not because it isn’t global—everything is global. But because it exceeds the frame. It should be heard as a work of composition, arrangement, and formal argument. It belongs to the tradition of artists who discovered that their grief required a new form to contain it, and then built that form.

That takes courage. It takes technical facility. It takes an understanding of what two traditions can do when they approach each other with respect instead of appropriation.

I’ve been listening to new music for forty years in this market. Not many records do what Vulture Prince does. Most stay within one frame. This one changes the frame itself.

The Grammy and What It Means

Vulture Prince won the Grammy for Best Global Music Performance in 2023 — a recognition that carried a category problem. “Global Music” is the designation major award bodies use to honor work from outside Western pop and rock without integrating it into the main conversation. It is recognition and marginalization simultaneously.

The record deserves to be heard as a work of composition, arrangement, and formal argument. It belongs to the tradition of artists who discovered that their grief required a new form to contain it, and then built that form. Aftab has said in interviews that the album was never intended for release — it was made to process what had happened, and the decision to release it came later, after she understood that what she’d made might reach people who needed it.

That origin explains the album’s texture. It was not made to be marketed. It was made to survive something. The difference is audible in every track, and it’s why the record holds up across repeated listens where more deliberately constructed albums often don’t. Grief of this kind — specific, unflinching, structurally integrated — doesn’t age the way sentiment does. It just continues to be what it is.

Since Vulture Prince, Aftab has released Night Reign (2024), which moves in different directions. But this record is the one that announced her. It is, in the specific sense that matters, the record only she could have made.

Explore more in our contemporary artists collection.